Monday, 2 July 2012
A new start brings a new resolve to keep things ticking over - I'll be moving the blog over to Wordpress in the coming days and updating more regularly. Website links will be updated accordingly.
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
The fact that weekend was a success was largely down to a huge slice of luck (about time!) in finding a Capercaillie defending his territory - which just happened to include the footpath we were on. True to my preference for finding my own subjects, we chose to go our own way rather than use tours or safari-type services provided by others. In hindsight, for such a short period of time in an unfamiliar terrain, I think you really need to go down that route for the best chance of getting the shots. Our second day (which only produced a couple of distant red grouse images) proved that point; the mountain hares we saw were flat on the A95, we didn't manage to find any deer or pine martens and only had a fleeting glance of a red squirrel.
The Capercaillie saved the weekend from an images-captured perspective, but I wouldn't have been too disappointed if we hadn't had that luck. The experience itself was worth the journey. We had a 2am climb up the Craigellachie reserve producing great views across Aviemore, snow/rain from a clear sky (!) and ponds brimming with amorous toads and frogs. It looked like the lack of snow this season has had an effect on businesses in the town - though from talking to locals they're still living off the last two winters!
All in all, it was a great weekend with an old friend and produced lots of images of a very special creature. I can't wait for the next trip!
You can find more Capercaillie and other shots from the weekend on flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrism1975/sets/72157629624482899/
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
My real interest over the next month comes with the hares. It's not an easy image to find, but the "boxing" that occurs most frequently at this time of year is one I'm after. The female - in condition for just a few hours every six weeks or so - fights off over-zealous males hoping to make their genes the ones that are passed on to the next generation. Of the locations I know for hares, only one is local. It'll need early starts and a truckload of good fortune.
I also have a hastily-arranged visit to Scotland on the horizon, hopefully to find mountain hares (perhaps with winter coat still at least partially on), grouse, red deer and anything else that presents itself. It's my first visit to the Cairngorms, the shots I return with are not the priority this time - finding our way and the experience of being in a challenging environment is. I'm sure I've said it many times before, but I don't like using tours and existing hides to find my subjects. Maybe this will prove a bridge too far and I'll relent in future - but if you don't try...
|Greater Spotted Woodpecker in the rain|
Moving on, in the last couple of months Nikon have announced two new bodies of real interest. The D4 is a 16.2 megapixel, full frame, professional DSLR that sports and wildlife photographers will find very appealing. However, a £4700 price tag is not so appealing, and makes it hard to justify to anyone but a full-time professional or those with more cash than sense. The D800 has a whopping 36 megapixel sensor and a much kinder-to-the-wallet cost of £2400 (or £2800 for the D800e, with the anti-alias filter removed - essentially for a sharper image but at higher risk of a "moire" effect). The downside for a wildlife photographer is the puny FPS and enormous RAW files involved. Doubtless you'll also give up ISO performance to the D4, perhaps D3s as well. This brings me to "the" question. My D300 just isn't capable of the quality these monsters produce and it's getting a little long in the tooth. Maybe it can compare if shooting at ISO 200 with great light, an obliging subject and uniform colours - but the reality is you'll be lucky to get more than a few days a year like that. Shooting with a cropped sensor also increases the depth of field, useful on occasion - but unable to achieve the same creamy background blur (or "bokeh") that you get from a full fame camera. I need an updated body. To me, realistically the D4 is out of reach. I'd have to give up any hope of a long lens for the foreseeable future. So the preferred options are currently a D800 or used D3s...
The case for the D3s:
* Solid, weighty professional camera. Still the best Nikon body available today in terms of ISO performance, FPS and build quality... until the D4 starts to ship, which is unlikely to be anytime soon for mere mortals like me.
* 2nd hand prices likely to drop to around £2600 or so, but only when D4 is established and available
* CF slots - no new media needed, I have what I need here...
* Frames per Second - way above what the D800 will offer
* Smaller NEF files - Not much larger than my D300 currently churns out
* Better the devil you know - There are plenty of photographers out there producing stunning images with a D3s. That doesn't change overnight because a new, untested body or two arrives on the scene.
* Battery life - lasts longer than D4 or D800, according to the specs
The case for the D800:
* Brand new, state-of-the-art pro Nikon body. Same AF as the D4, whopping number of pixels (36mp) and likely to be capable of the best images you'll see from a Nikon DSLR for some time
* Cheaper than a 2nd Hand D3s
* Next-generation auto focus, a subject of minor complaint from some D3s owners
* Would I need a 500/600mm lens on this thing? Resolution that makes cropping from a 300mm a realistic option
* Who needs FPS if you're not a "spray'n'pray" shooter?
* Low light performance should still beat D300 hands down
* Smaller and lighter than the D3s, should be easier to handle and support
* Video capabilities should be very, very good. It's not something I do at the moment (D90 isn't really worth bothering with on this front) but likely will in the future
* Promises to be fantastic for landscapes - and portraits / weddings should I decide to go down that route
* Purchase new = warranty and perhaps Nikon loving me a bit more!
There's probably things I've missed here and a few unknowns that will emerge with the new gear as time goes on (feel free to add to the argument!). No doubt some would prefer to invest in glass and/or support, camo gear, rain proofing, new laptop... the list goes on. I'm at a stage where I feel the most pressing need to improve the results I'm getting comes from the body I'm using. I'm finding I have the camera settings at wide open, using ISO1600 at 1/200 too frequently. That in itself suggests the D3s might be the better option, but until the D800 is tested and in wider circulation the jury is out on ISO performance. It's not a decision I'm going to rush... By the time I'm ready to take the plunge I wholly expect a D400 release to complicate the choice further!
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
When you're sorting through old images to free up space, sometimes you find one or two that you missed first time around. This image of (what I believe to be) a parasitic wasp of some description is a good example. Forever consigned to an obscure folder on my back-up drive, I've dug it up and played around a bit - and created what I think is a nicely composed, pleasantly toned vision of bugness. I guess I'd better keep on sorting...
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
Above is my favourite image of 2011. It's nothing to write home about technically or aesthetically, but it encapsulates the drama and unpredictably of our wild animals.
It was a uninspiring, murky day at Warnham LNR. I'd only stopped by to satisfy the "photography itch" after a few days of not being able to get out. Little was occurring, just a few greylags and canada geese squaring up... then all hell broke loose below me! The moorhens, some of which were obviously 1st years trying their luck, erupted into noise. Chasing each other around the mill pond in front of the hide, these two went into battle. This was a turf fight, and they weren't holding back.
I like this particular image as it gives an impression of the ferocity of the battle, with the added bonus of a "referee" watching on to add to the dramatic impact of the shot. It's always fascinating to see this kind of behaviour... and to me it's just as spectacular when it's a common, British water bird as male lions fighting it out in Africa.
Turning to the coming year - my immediate plans are to spend some more time with the Short eared owls, chasing that elusive "battle" shot. I came very close earlier this week, only to have a inconsiderately-sited bush spoil things at the critical moment! In reality, the dismal light would have prevented an acceptably good image, so I wasn't that disappointed. The forecast is better for the coming days - maybe my luck will turn soon. I'm also hoping to fit in a couple of trips to the west of Kent to track down wild boar. They're elusive creatures that can cause serious injury if they feel threatened; it'll be a good workout for my tracking skills.
I have secured some work for the coming months, which should pay the bills AND allow me some photography time! All in all, I've had a pretty good start to 2012, I can only hope it continues...
Monday, 19 December 2011
As of Monday last, my visits have seen me sat in the same spot beside a bush, under a scrim net. A few metres away is a branch I've embedded in the ground, behind it a pleasant backdrop of long grass and dark tree shapes above the horizon. Since the only tripod I possess has a aluminium finish, I've been using the monopod - not ideal, but at that range visual disturbance could be a factor; you have to consider these details with wild animals, their primary instinct is survival. A shiny, reflective surface (even under a net) could cause enough alarm to disturb or divert them. Fortunately the ground is soft enough to thoroughly wedge the monopod into the soil and firm enough support the weight of the kit; trying to hold it in position for hours on end would be tiresome.
The main problem is that the owls have been largely ignoring the perch! I'd give it a 50-1 chance on any given day that it'd be utilised, so the odds aren't great to start with. One female SEO (like Barn Owls, they are generally darker in colour than the male) did land on it on Monday - at gone 4pm when I was on my way back to the car. Typical! On a more positive note, the location I've picked seems good - I've had some fabulous views of the owls over my head and close by; one even landed a few feet away in the grass. I could have taken some half-decent landing or flight shots, but suddenly burst shooting at that range risks disturbing them. I've restricted myself to firing the shutter a couple of times (with camera aimed at nothing in particular!) so that the owls are used to the noise. It's disappointing to come away with nothing on the memory card, but there's no point blowing it for the same kind of shot I already have. I know what I want from the effort I'm putting in, if I get just one good image out it I'll be happy.
Having watched the owls for a while now, there's no clear preference for the type of perch they'll land on - except that it's usually close to some scrub or bushes. They appear comfortable with (or oblivious to) me, so I don't think I need to revise the location or set-up.
Hopefully I'll be able to report back later with a fine image or two. How long "later" will be is hard to predict!